![]() |
|
![]() |
| Bedford Liberal Democrats | <bedford@bedfordlibdems.org> |
Bedford and Kempston MP votes for post office closures6.10.05pm GMT Thu 20th Mar 2008
Bedford Borough Liberal Democrats have accused Bedford and Kempston Labour MP Patrick Hall of failing to support local services after he voted to support the Government's massive post office closure programme. The Government has ordered that one in five branches be closed. Opposition MPs tried to stop the closure programme last night when a motion was proposed in the House of Commons demanding the Government halt their plans to make 2500 branches shut up shop. But enough Labour MPs rallied around the Government's closure plans to reject the motion and ensure the closure programme can continue unhindered. One of those voting to close post offices was Bedford and Kempston's MP Patrick Hall. Local Liberal Democrats, who launched the Save Bedford's Post Offices campaign after local branches due for closure were mistakenly published on the internet last year ahead of a consultation this summer, are calling on Patrick Hall to explain why he voted to close post offices. Liberal Democrat Councillor for De Parys Ward David Sawyer, who has campaigned to save Kimbolton Road Post Office since the internet blunder revealed that it is one of seven branches in Bedford Borough due for closure, said: "In July the announcement will be made as to which branches here will be put forward for closure. We already know which branches are most likely to close here, as they were published on the internet accidentally last year. Communities across the borough have received the devastating news that they face the prospect of losing their essential local post office. Last night Bedford and Kempston's Labour MP had an opportunity to make a stand on behalf of those communities. Instead he has backed the Government's scandalous closures rather than local people.' "The loss of post offices will hit communities hard in Bedford Borough. They are vital assets for local people and closing them will cause many difficulties for older people and others with mobility problems, in particular. The Labour Government seems determined to rip the heart out of our local communities, and it is outrageous that Patrick Hall is backing this approach.' "Despite the decision of our Labour MP to help the Government press ahead with closure, Liberal Democrats are continuing to fight the demolition of the post office network and to Save Bedford's Post Offices."
Bookmark this story at:
Related News Stories:Fri 7th May 2010: General Election 2010 - The Result in Bedford and Kempston. Sun 2nd May 2010: Henry Vann sets out priorities for Bedford and Kempston at public meeting. Mon 29th Mar 2010: Budget a missed opportunity Bedford and Kempston. Mon 25th Jan 2010: Almost 2,500 people in Bedford and Kempston missing out on Cold Weather Payments. Sat 29th Aug 2009: Bedford and Kempston have been 'left in the sidings' once again, says local parliamentary campaigner. Sun 10th May 2009: Job vacancies plummet in Bedford and Kempston. Wed 29th Apr 2009: Only one in 25 families facing repossession in Bedford and Kempston to get help. Sat 28th Feb 2009: Christmas comes late for 1,431 elderly people in Bedford and Kempston. Tue 24th Feb 2009: Thu 27th Nov 2008: Pre-Budget Report "simply not enough for Bedford and Kempston" says Henry Vann. Thu 18th Sep 2008: Devastating Blow for Local Communities in Bedford as Post Office Closures are Confirmed. Tue 8th Jul 2008: Savage Post Office Closures in Bedford Borough Announced. Thu 12th Jun 2008: Lib Dems Attack Post Office Closures. Tue 11th Dec 2007: Commitment and Sincerity Needed in Fight to Save Bedford's Post Offices, Not Tory Hypocrisy. Wed 5th Dec 2007: Fight to Save Bedford's Post Offices Begins as Blunder Reveals Local Branches in the Firing Line. Fri 18th May 2007: Government Fails to Listen on Post Office Closures. Tue 19th Dec 2006: Post Office Closures Are A Betrayal - Davey. Sun 17th Apr 2005: Published and promoted by Bedford Liberal Democrats, 37 Kathie Road, Bedford MK42 0QJ. The views expressed are those of the party, not of the service provider. |